Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-09-15 Thread Simon Glass
On 15 September 2015 at 01:55, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On Friday 11 September 2015 04:24 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: >> On Wednesday 09 September 2015 11:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Monday, 7 September 2015, Mugunthan V N wrote: On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Wa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-09-15 Thread Mugunthan V N
On Friday 11 September 2015 04:24 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On Wednesday 09 September 2015 11:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Monday, 7 September 2015, Mugunthan V N wrote: >>> >>> On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren fdtdec_get_a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-09-11 Thread Mugunthan V N
On Wednesday 09 September 2015 11:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday, 7 September 2015, Mugunthan V N wrote: >> >> On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent >>> an a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-09-09 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Monday, 7 September 2015, Mugunthan V N wrote: > > On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > From: Stephen Warren > > > > fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent > > an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-09-07 Thread Mugunthan V N
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent > an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on > the DT binding for a particular node or property (e.g. it is incor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-08-09 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 6 August 2015 at 15:31, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent > an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on > the DT binding for a particular node or property (e.g. it is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-08-06 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/06/2015 03:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on the DT binding for a particular node or property (e.g. it is incorrect for the "reg" property). In most case

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

2015-08-06 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on the DT binding for a particular node or property (e.g. it is incorrect for the "reg" property). In most cases, DT parsing code must u