On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Brüns, Stefan
wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2017 11:28:37 CEST Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> [...]
>> >>
>> >> @@ -356,7 +356,8 @@ efi_status_t efi_allocate_pool(int pool_type,
>> >> unsigned long size,>>
>> >> {
>> >>
On Mittwoch, 2. August 2017 11:28:37 CEST Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
[...]
> >>
> >> @@ -356,7 +356,8 @@ efi_status_t efi_allocate_pool(int pool_type,
> >> unsigned long size,>>
> >> {
> >>
> >> efi_status_t r;
> >> efi_physical_addr_t t;
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 10:00 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> This avoids printf() spam about file reads (such as loading an image)
>> into unaligned buffers (and the associated memcpy()). And generally
>> seems like a good idea.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob
On 08/01/2017 10:00 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> This avoids printf() spam about file reads (such as loading an image)
> into unaligned buffers (and the associated memcpy()). And generally
> seems like a good idea.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> lib/efi_loader/efi_memory.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file c
This avoids printf() spam about file reads (such as loading an image)
into unaligned buffers (and the associated memcpy()). And generally
seems like a good idea.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
lib/efi_loader/efi_memory.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib
5 matches
Mail list logo