On 9 April 2017 at 13:28, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 7 April 2017 at 11:09, Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
>> The RK3399-Q7 (Puma) DTS should (of course) be dual-licensed.
>> This updates the licensing info in the rk3399-puma.dts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich
>>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm/dts/rk3399-
On 7 April 2017 at 11:09, Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
> The RK3399-Q7 (Puma) DTS should (of course) be dual-licensed.
> This updates the licensing info in the rk3399-puma.dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich
>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/dts/rk3399-puma.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 delet
The RK3399-Q7 (Puma) DTS should (of course) be dual-licensed.
This updates the licensing info in the rk3399-puma.dts.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich
---
arch/arm/dts/rk3399-puma.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3399-puma.dts b/arch/arm/dts/
3 matches
Mail list logo