Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts: keep clock-names and clocks in SPL DTB if SPL_CLK is enabled

2016-02-25 Thread Simon Glass
On 23 February 2016 at 22:09, Simon Glass wrote: > On 3 February 2016 at 04:51, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> These two properties are necessary for SPL to get clocks from DT. >> >> Note: >> For now, only clock look-up by index is supported (clk_get_by_index() >> function), so "clock-names" is neve

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts: keep clock-names and clocks in SPL DTB if SPL_CLK is enabled

2016-02-23 Thread Simon Glass
On 3 February 2016 at 04:51, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > These two properties are necessary for SPL to get clocks from DT. > > Note: > For now, only clock look-up by index is supported (clk_get_by_index() > function), so "clock-names" is never parsed in U-Boot. However, we > may want to support some

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts: keep clock-names and clocks in SPL DTB if SPL_CLK is enabled

2016-02-17 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Simon, Any comment on this patch? 2016-02-03 20:51 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > These two properties are necessary for SPL to get clocks from DT. > > Note: > For now, only clock look-up by index is supported (clk_get_by_index() > function), so "clock-names" is never parsed in U-Boot. However

[U-Boot] [PATCH] dts: keep clock-names and clocks in SPL DTB if SPL_CLK is enabled

2016-02-03 Thread Masahiro Yamada
These two properties are necessary for SPL to get clocks from DT. Note: For now, only clock look-up by index is supported (clk_get_by_index() function), so "clock-names" is never parsed in U-Boot. However, we may want to support something like clk_get_by_name() in the future, so let's keep "clock