Hi Måns,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:29:24 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> > Hi Måns,
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:23:44 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On the compiler side, gcc traditionally did not issue unaligned
> >> load/store instructions on ARM.
> >
> >
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> Hi Måns,
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:23:44 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> wrote:
>
>> On the compiler side, gcc traditionally did not issue unaligned
>> load/store instructions on ARM.
>
> Please be specific: gcc did not emit *native* unaligned accesses.
Please explain what you
Hi Måns,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:23:44 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> >> > I sense that you have not understood the reason why I want alignment
> >> > checking enabled in ARM yet also want ARMv6+ builds to emit native
> >> > unaligned accesses if they consider it neede
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>> > I sense that you have not understood the reason why I want alignment
>> > checking enabled in ARM yet also want ARMv6+ builds to emit native
>> > unaligned accesses if they consider it needed.
>>
>> Your wishes are mutually exclusive. You cannot both allow hardware
>
Hi Måns,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:59:56 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> > Hi Måns,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:09:39 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi Måns,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> Hi Måns,
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:09:39 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> wrote:
>
>> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>>
>> > Hi Måns,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>> >>
>> >> >> > Please do not advise using
Hi Måns,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:09:39 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> > Hi Måns,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> >>
> >> >> > Please do not advise using native unaligned accesses on code that is
ek; 'Tom Rini'; u-boot@lists.denx.de; 'Kyungmin Park'
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk:efi: avoid unaligned access on efi
> > partition
> >
> > Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> >
> > >> > Please do not advise using native unaligned a
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> Hi Måns,
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> wrote:
>
>> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>>
>> >> > Please do not advise using native unaligned accesses on code that is
>> >> > not strictly used by ARMv6+ architectures: the present code, for
>> >> > instance
Dear Albert and Måns,
> -Original Message-
> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mansr.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 3:05 PM
> To: Albert ARIBAUD
> Cc: Piotr Wilczek; 'Tom Rini'; u-boot@lists.denx.de; 'Kyungmin Park'
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATC
Hi Måns,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> >> > Please do not advise using native unaligned accesses on code that is
> >> > not strictly used by ARMv6+ architectures: the present code, for
> >> > instance, might be run on pre-ARMv6 or non-ARM
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>> > Please do not advise using native unaligned accesses on code that is
>> > not strictly used by ARMv6+ architectures: the present code, for
>> > instance, might be run on pre-ARMv6 or non-ARM platforms, and thus,
>> > should never assume ability to perform unaligned acc
Hi Måns,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:19:27 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Albert ARIBAUD writes:
>
> > Hi Måns,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:50:42 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Piotr Wilczek writes:
> >>
> >> >> -Original Message-
> >> >> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mans
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> Hi Måns,
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:50:42 +0100, Måns Rullgård
> wrote:
>
>> Piotr Wilczek writes:
>>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mansr.com]
>> >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:29 AM
>> >> To: Piotr Wilczek
>> >> Cc: u-b
Hi Måns,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:50:42 +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Piotr Wilczek writes:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mansr.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:29 AM
> >> To: Piotr Wilczek
> >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini; Kyungmin Pa
Piotr Wilczek writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mansr.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:29 AM
>> To: Piotr Wilczek
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini; Kyungmin Park
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] disk:efi: avoid unaligned access on efi partition
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Måns Rullgård [mailto:m...@mansr.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:29 AM
> To: Piotr Wilczek
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini; Kyungmin Park
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] disk:efi: avoid unaligned access on efi partition
>
> Piotr Wilczek writes:
>
> >
Piotr Wilczek writes:
> In this patch static variable and memcpy instead of an assignment
> are used to avoid unaligned access exception on some ARM platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> CC: Tom Rini
> ---
> disk/part_efi.c |6 --
> 1 file change
Hi Piotr,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:31:10 +0200, Piotr Wilczek
wrote:
> In this patch static variable and memcpy instead of an assignment
> are used to avoid unaligned access exception on some ARM platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> CC: Tom Rini
> ---
>
In this patch static variable and memcpy instead of an assignment
are used to avoid unaligned access exception on some ARM platforms.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
CC: Tom Rini
---
disk/part_efi.c |6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
20 matches
Mail list logo
