* Doug Anderson wrote:
> Agreed--I see myself in the CC from the start.
That leaves me really confused.
Thierry
pgptqQ3sZUSiB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Thierry,
> * Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 11/17/2011 08:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>> > I had actually set "Doug Anderson " on Cc
>> > because he was involved with the initial patch but for some reason
>> > he got stripped from Cc. Does anybody know why this is happening?
>>
>> Probably
e in this thread.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thierry Reding [mailto:thierry.red...@avionic-design.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:08 AM
> > To: Stefano Babic
> > Cc: Tom Warren; Doug Anderson; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Thierry Reding
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:35 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Tom Warren
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: Fix pa
> Cc: Tom Warren; Doug Anderson; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: Fix parameters passed to
> is_gpt_valid().
>
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> * Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 11/17/2011 08:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
&g
* Stephen Warren wrote:
> Thierry Reding wrote at Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:05 AM:
> > Something apparently went wrong when the patch in commit deb5ca8 was
> > applied. Commit f75dd58 changed the type of gpt_head to be a pointer and
> > correctly adjusted the calls to is_gpt_valid(). But when
Thierry Reding wrote at Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:05 AM:
> Something apparently went wrong when the patch in commit deb5ca8 was
> applied. Commit f75dd58 changed the type of gpt_head to be a pointer and
> correctly adjusted the calls to is_gpt_valid(). But when deb5ca8 got
> applied, the gpt_h
* Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 08:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > I had actually set "Doug Anderson " on Cc
> > because he was involved with the initial patch but for some reason
> > he got stripped from Cc. Does anybody know why this is happening?
>
> Probably Doug has received the
On 11/17/2011 08:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I had actually set "Doug Anderson " on Cc
> because he was involved with the initial patch but for some reason
> he got stripped from Cc. Does anybody know why this is happening?
Probably Doug has received the first e-mail. I noted that git
send-e
* Thierry Reding wrote:
> Something apparently went wrong when the patch in commit deb5ca8 was
> applied. Commit f75dd58 changed the type of gpt_head to be a pointer and
> correctly adjusted the calls to is_gpt_valid(). But when deb5ca8 got
> applied, the gpt_head was again reverted to &(gpt_head),
Something apparently went wrong when the patch in commit deb5ca8 was
applied. Commit f75dd58 changed the type of gpt_head to be a pointer and
correctly adjusted the calls to is_gpt_valid(). But when deb5ca8 got
applied, the gpt_head was again reverted to &(gpt_head), which was the
state before deb5
11 matches
Mail list logo
