Hi,
On 07/27/2014 10:31 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 15:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this.
>>
>> The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the
Hi,
On 07/27/2014 10:31 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 15:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this.
>>
>> The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 15:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this.
>
> The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the logic is
> backwards,
> all board get AXP209 unless N
Hi,
On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this.
The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the logic is
backwards,
all board get AXP209 unless NO_AXP or AXP152 are defined.
I decided to not carry this "magic" forwa
For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
---
boards.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
index 47028e8..8572972 100644
--- a/boards.cfg
+++ b/boards.cfg
@@ -379,8 +379,8 @@ Active ar
5 matches
Mail list logo