Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_onenand.c: moved to standard subcommand handling

2010-05-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Frans Meulenbroeks, In message <1269706476-20496-1-git-send-email-fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> you wrote: > On the fly also fixed the following things: > - write help talked about a parameter oob, but that one was not used, so > removed it from the help message. > - the test command also a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_onenand.c: moved to standard subcommand handling

2010-03-29 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Frans, > 2010/3/29 Detlev Zundel : >> Hi Frans, >> >>> Forgot this disclaimer, thought I added it, sry. >>> >>> NOTE: >>> This code is untested as I have no board with onenand support. >>> However, it compiles properly (tested by building opap3_evm, which uses >>> this). >>> The changes I did

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_onenand.c: moved to standard subcommand handling

2010-03-29 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Frans, > Forgot this disclaimer, thought I added it, sry. > > NOTE: > This code is untested as I have no board with onenand support. > However, it compiles properly (tested by building opap3_evm, which uses this). > The changes I did are purely splitting do_onenand in separate > functions and a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_onenand.c: moved to standard subcommand handling

2010-03-27 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Forgot this disclaimer, thought I added it, sry. NOTE: This code is untested as I have no board with onenand support. However, it compiles properly (tested by building opap3_evm, which uses this). The changes I did are purely splitting do_onenand in separate functions and add the subcommand parsin

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_onenand.c: moved to standard subcommand handling

2010-03-27 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
On the fly also fixed the following things: - write help talked about a parameter oob, but that one was not used, so removed it from the help message. - the test command also allowed a force subcommand but didn't use it. eliminated the code. - do_onenand made static - do_onenand contained