On 17 October 2016 at 16:17, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 16 October 2016 at 09:13, Stefan Brüns
> wrote:
>> GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
>>
>> ../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
>> ../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard...
>> [-Wmisleadi
On 16 October 2016 at 09:13, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
>
> ../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
> ../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard...
> [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
>^~~
>
GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard...
[-Wmisleading-indentation]
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
^~~
../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter
3 matches
Mail list logo