On Thu 2014-07-10 01:08:28, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Pavel Machek,
>
> In message <20140709204257.ga28...@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> you wrote:
> >
> > If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
> > u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
> > filename
Dear Pavel Machek,
In message <20140709204257.ga28...@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> you wrote:
>
> If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
> u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
> filename from environment. That is confusing, display help instead.
>
On Wed 2014-07-09 23:07:56, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 at 10:42:57 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
> > u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
> > filename from environment. That is conf
On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 at 10:42:57 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
> u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
> filename from environment. That is confusing, display help instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel
Hi!
> If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
> u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
> filename from environment. That is confusing, display help instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
Oops and actually I should warn... this patch
If filename is passed instead of address to ext2load or fatload,
u-boot silently accepts that, and uses 0 for load address and default
filename from environment. That is confusing, display help instead.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
diff --git a/fs/fs.c b/fs/fs.c
index 79d432d..ea15c5f 100644
6 matches
Mail list logo