Hi Paul,
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > But which board does it actually break, please?
>
> I don't think any of the default configs included in u-boot would have
> broken, while some of them define CONFI
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> But which board does it actually break, please?
I don't think any of the default configs included in u-boot would have
broken, while some of them define CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE, none of them
define CONFIG_SILENT_U_BOOT_ONLY. I was worki
Looks like this was broken in commit 35fc84fa1ff51e15ecd3e464dac87eb105ffed30,
the refactor changed the conditional test when the code was moved.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:29:09PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> This function is only defined if CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE is set and
> CONFIG_SILENT_U_B
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Looks like this was broken in commit
> 35fc84fa1ff51e15ecd3e464dac87eb105ffed30,
> the refactor changed the conditional test when the code was moved.
>
>
This looks right.
Acked-by: Simon Glass
But which board does it actually b
This function is only defined if CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE is set and
CONFIG_SILENT_U_BOOT_ONLY is not set, the call to it should be based
on the same conditions.
Signed-off-by: Paul B. Henson
---
common/cmd_bootm.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd
5 matches
Mail list logo
