Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-11-06 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 18:29 Wed 05 Nov , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Dear Jean, >> >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-11-06 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 18:29 Wed 05 Nov , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Dear Jean, >> >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-11-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > The attribute ".weak" works only if the file where is the weak function > > is not in a library. > This method of build will not generate a library evenif it's still called > libat91.a, it will generate a pre-bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-11-05 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:29 Wed 05 Nov , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Dear Jean, > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > > > >> Dear Jean-Christophe, > >> > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> > >>> On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-11-05 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Dear Jean-Christophe, >> >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe, > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > >> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > >> > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> > I've found that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-28 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, >> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting fu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-28 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting > > > function is in a file (not archive) that has strongly-linked symbols. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ilko, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > On 09:27 Mon 27 Oct , Ben Warren wrote: ... > >> I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting > >> function is in a file (not archive) that has strongly-linked symbols. > >> Admittedly, I've only done this wi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting > > function is in a file (not archive) that has strongly-linked symbols. > > Admittedly, I've only done this with C code but expect that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:27 Mon 27 Oct , Ben Warren wrote: > >> Hi Ilko, >> >> Ilko Iliev wrote: >> >> >>> I tried several variants to make the function lowlevel_init() weak but >>> without success. >>> If there is no other solution for th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:27 Mon 27 Oct , Ben Warren wrote: > Hi Ilko, > > Ilko Iliev wrote: > > > I tried several variants to make the function lowlevel_init() weak but > > without success. > > If there is no other solution for the problem could you commit my patch. > > Without this patch I can't post the patc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Ilko, Ilko Iliev wrote: > I tried several variants to make the function lowlevel_init() weak but > without success. > If there is no other solution for the problem could you commit my patch. > Without this patch I can't post the patch for our PM9261 and PM9263 boards. > > I've found that w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-27 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> >>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Ilko Iliev
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> >>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:12 Wed 22

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > > > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> > >>> On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >>> > >>> > Dear Mr. Denk, > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Ilko Iliev
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> >>> Dear Mr. Denk, > Dear Ilko Iliev, > > In mess

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: >> >>> Dear Mr. Denk, >>> >>> Dear Ilko Iliev, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Maybe instead of adding mor #ifde

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Ilko Iliev
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > >> Dear Mr. Denk, >> >> >>> Dear Ilko Iliev, >>> >>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> >>> > Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn > lowlevel_init() into

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Dear Mr. Denk, > > > Dear Ilko Iliev, > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > >>> Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn > >>> lowlevel_init() into a "weak" function that can be redefined by board > >>> specific cod

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-22 Thread Ilko Iliev
Dear Mr. Denk, > Dear Ilko Iliev, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >>> Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn >>> lowlevel_init() into a "weak" function that can be redefined by board >>> specific code? >>> >> The lowlevel_init() is an assembler function

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ilko Iliev, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn > > lowlevel_init() into a "weak" function that can be redefined by board > > specific code? > The lowlevel_init() is an assembler function called from another > assembler fun

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-21 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:00 Tue 21 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Ilko Iliev, > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > >> This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> index ec6ad5d..788

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-21 Thread Ilko Iliev
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Ilko Iliev, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S >> >> Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644 >> --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S >> +++ b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ilko Iliev, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S > > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644 > --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S > +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: board specific lowlevel_init.S

2008-10-21 Thread Ilko Iliev
This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #include #include -#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INI