Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm64: zero cntvoff_el2

2014-06-09 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Mark, On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:29:23 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Currently cntvoff_el2 is initialised with an arbitrary bag of bits > derived from the initial value of cnthctl_el2 on the current CPU. This is > somewhat odd and problematic as some of these bits are UNKNOWN at reset > and may di

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm64: zero cntvoff_el2

2014-05-22 Thread feng...@phytium.com.cn
> Currently cntvoff_el2 is initialised with an arbitrary bag of bits > derived from the initial value of cnthctl_el2 on the current CPU. This is > somewhat odd and problematic as some of these bits are UNKNOWN at reset > and may differ across CPUs (which may cause an OS at EL1 to observe time > go

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm64: zero cntvoff_el2

2014-05-21 Thread Mark Rutland
Currently cntvoff_el2 is initialised with an arbitrary bag of bits derived from the initial value of cnthctl_el2 on the current CPU. This is somewhat odd and problematic as some of these bits are UNKNOWN at reset and may differ across CPUs (which may cause an OS at EL1 to observe time going backwar