On 29/04/2013 02:17, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The VDDMEM ramped up in very weird way as it was horribly misconfigured.
> Instead of setting up VDDMEM in one swipe, let it rise slowly the same
> way as VDDD and VDDA in spl_power_init.c and then only clear ILIMIT before
> memory gets inited. This makes s
Hi Stefano,
this one too ;-)
> The VDDMEM ramped up in very weird way as it was horribly misconfigured.
> Instead of setting up VDDMEM in one swipe, let it rise slowly the same
> way as VDDD and VDDA in spl_power_init.c and then only clear ILIMIT before
> memory gets inited. This makes sure the V
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This should be done in board//mx23evk/spl_boot.c alongside iomux, no?
Yes, but the end result of DDR IOMUX settings are not correct in this file.
Let's take HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE9 register for example:
=> md.l 0x80018290
80018290:
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Without the patch skipping registers, the console output gets scrambled.
> >
> > Ok, so we have issue in spl_mem_init.c for MX23.
>
> This is my thought as well.
>
> I sent the "skipping registers" t
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Without the patch skipping registers, the console output gets scrambled.
>
> Ok, so we have issue in spl_mem_init.c for MX23.
This is my thought as well.
I sent the "skipping registers" to Kiril after comparing U-boot code
again
Dear Kiril Zyapkov,
> Hello everyone,
>
> On 29/04/13 15:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Hello Marek,
> >
> > (adding Kiril in Cc as he been quite friendly in testing U-Boot in
> > OlinuXino)
>
> Per Otavio's instructions:
>* checked out git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx.git, branch master
>*
Hello everyone,
On 29/04/13 15:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Marek,
(adding Kiril in Cc as he been quite friendly in testing U-Boot in
OlinuXino)
Per Otavio's instructions:
* checked out git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx.git, branch master
* applied http://pastebin.com/qub5fP1P (skips writi
Hello Marek,
(adding Kiril in Cc as he been quite friendly in testing U-Boot in OlinuXino)
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The VDDMEM ramped up in very weird way as it was horribly misconfigured.
> Instead of setting up VDDMEM in one swipe, let it rise slowly the same
> way
Dear Marek Vasut,
> The VDDMEM ramped up in very weird way as it was horribly misconfigured.
> Instead of setting up VDDMEM in one swipe, let it rise slowly the same
> way as VDDD and VDDA in spl_power_init.c and then only clear ILIMIT before
> memory gets inited. This makes sure the VDDMEM rises
The VDDMEM ramped up in very weird way as it was horribly misconfigured.
Instead of setting up VDDMEM in one swipe, let it rise slowly the same
way as VDDD and VDDA in spl_power_init.c and then only clear ILIMIT before
memory gets inited. This makes sure the VDDMEM rises sanely, not jumps up
and do
10 matches
Mail list logo