Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <1289544835-24425-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> suggested from Daniel Hobi
>
> Tested on following boards:
> arm1136: qong
> armv7: omap3_beagle
> arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
> cc: Daniel Hobi
> cc: Albert ARIBAUD
>
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message <4cdd0d1f.7010...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Passing gd as parameter makes no sense, thoug, as it's global data and
> > we reserve a register to store it's address, so it can always be used
> > with minimal overhead.
>
> Which is a really nice idea if you have a regi
On 12/11/10 19:50, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> In message <4cdce769.8080...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>>
>> Is bootflag ever used? If not, why not change the parameter to
>> give the gd address to board_init_f?
>
> No, bootflag is never used and could / should be removed.
On 12/11/10 18:19, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Reinhard,
>
> Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
>> Is bootflag ever used? If not, why not change the parameter to
>
> No.
>
>> give the gd address to board_ini
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message <4cdce769.8080...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>
> Is bootflag ever used? If not, why not change the parameter to
> give the gd address to board_init_f?
No, bootflag is never used and could / should be removed.
Passing gd as parameter makes no sense, thoug, as it
Hello Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 12/11/2010 07:53, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
>> suggested from Daniel Hobi
>>
>> Tested on following boards:
>> arm1136: qong
>> armv7: omap3_beagle
>> arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
>> cc: Daniel Hobi
>> cc: Albert ARIBAUD
>
Le 12/11/2010 08:19, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
>> One further thought, why not init the reserved register in assembly and
>> remove the gd relevant code in C? But that bears some risk if the register
>> is changed and the assembly is forgotten to adapt..
>
> No, I think this is to risky ...
It is
Le 12/11/2010 07:53, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
> suggested from Daniel Hobi
>
> Tested on following boards:
> arm1136: qong
> armv7: omap3_beagle
> arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
> cc: Daniel Hobi
> cc: Albert ARIBAUD
I'm a bit uneasy about having the symbol unaligned
Hello Reinhard,
Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
>> index ace0c07..91cdd72 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
>> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ reset:
>> /* Set stackpointer i
Dear Heiko Schocher,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
> index ace0c07..91cdd72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/start.S
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ reset:
> /* Set stackpointer in internal RAM to call board_init_f */
> call
suggested from Daniel Hobi
Tested on following boards:
arm1136: qong
armv7: omap3_beagle
arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
cc: Daniel Hobi
cc: Albert ARIBAUD
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S |1 +
arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S |1 +
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start
11 matches
Mail list logo