Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-12-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Korsgaard, In message <1258627071-24531-1-git-send-email-jac...@sunsite.dk> you wrote: > Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling > (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if > CONFIG_LZO is enabled. > > Lzop doesn't compress as go

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-27 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard writes: Peter> Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling Peter> (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if Peter> CONFIG_LZO is enabled. Comments? Peter> Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Joakim" == Joakim Tjernlund writes: Hi, >> Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but >> decompression is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The >> lzop decompression code is based on Albin Tonnerre's recent ARM >> Linux lzo support patch. Joakim> Perhaps you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling > (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if > CONFIG_LZO is enabled. > > Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but decompression > is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The l

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if CONFIG_LZO is enabled. Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but decompression is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The lzop decompres