On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2012 03:23:42 Amit Virdi wrote:
>> >> I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
>> >> didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
>> >> retained and ehci directly de-refe
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 03:23:42 Amit Virdi wrote:
> >> I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
> >> didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
> >> retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
> >> come here too.
>
Dear Marek,
On 3/7/2012 5:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Amit Virdi,
Dear Marek,
I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
co
Dear Amit Virdi,
> Dear Marek,
>
> >> I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
> >> didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
> >> retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
> >> come here too.
> >>
> >> Today, I
Dear Marek,
I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
come here too.
Today, I used armv7-linux-gcc (GCC) v4.6.2
So I suspect the
Mike,
I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
come here too.
Today, I used armv7-linux-gcc (GCC) v4.6.2
So I suspect there ha
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 07:06:22 Amit Virdi wrote:
> On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
> > On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albe
Dear Amit Virdi,
> Hello Mike and Marek,
>
> On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 2/25/2012
Hello Mike and Marek,
On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
Hello Mike,
On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 24/02/2012 12:58
Hello Mike,
On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise w
On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > > Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
> > > > >> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> >
> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
> > > >> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> > > >> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
> > > >
On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
> > >> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> > >> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
> > >> Reverting
On Monday 27 February 2012 05:02:14 Amit Virdi wrote:
> On 2/25/2012 12:48 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 24 February 2012 06:58:40 Amit Virdi wrote:
> >> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> >> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
> >
> > so u
> On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Amit,
>
> Hello Albert,
>
> > Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
> >> From: Vipin Kumar
> >>
> >> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> >> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
> >> Reverting t
Hello Mike,
On 2/25/2012 12:48 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:58:40 Amit Virdi wrote:
Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
so use a compiler that isn't broken ?
It doesn't seem like comp
On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Amit,
Hello Albert,
Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
From: Vipin Kumar
Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
Reverting the structures to non-packed
If (j
Hi Amit,
Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a écrit :
From: Vipin Kumar
Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
Reverting the structures to non-packed
If (just asking, not asserting) the issue is caused by fields being
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:58:40 Amit Virdi wrote:
> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
so use a compiler that isn't broken ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
From: Vipin Kumar
Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
Reverting the structures to non-packed
Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar
Signed-off-by: Amit Virdi
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insert
20 matches
Mail list logo