Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable"

Thank you, gentlemen, the patch worked a treat... U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 03 2012 - 11:08:23) Pogoplug E02 SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 256 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: 128 MiB ``` Dave On Sat, Mar 3,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable"

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Thomas Weber wrote: > Hello Tom, > > will you take this patch? Or should we add the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT to the > boards? This just hit mainline via Scott's tree. -- Tom ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable"

Hello Tom, will you take this patch? Or should we add the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT to the boards? Regards, Thomas On 02/13/2012 10:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote: This reverts commit 4fee6c2f295f932b8febdc7ce8731ba045695fa5. It breaks boards that currently rely on soft-ecc, as pointed out here: http://

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable"

This reverts commit 4fee6c2f295f932b8febdc7ce8731ba045695fa5. It breaks boards that currently rely on soft-ecc, as pointed out here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/140872/ The reverted patch should be resubmitted with documentation, and with the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT selected from every board th