subject:"\[U\-Boot\] \[PATCH\] NET\: kirkwood\-egiga smi access fix"

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NET: kirkwood-egiga smi access fix

2010-02-06 Thread Ben Warren

Siddarth, On 1/18/2010 9:39 PM, Siddarth Gore wrote: > Although the datasheet mentions seperate smi registers for each > port, using Port 1 smi register to access ethernet phys does not > work. Hence only Port 0 smi register should be used to access all > devices connected to the smi bus. This beh

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NET: kirkwood-egiga smi access fix

2010-01-19 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar

> -Original Message- > From: Siddarth Gore [mailto:go...@marvell.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:09 AM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Siddarth Gore > Subject: [PATCH] NET: kirkwood-egiga smi access fix > > Although the datasheet mentions seperate smi regi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NET: kirkwood-egiga smi access fix

2010-01-18 Thread Siddarth Gore

Although the datasheet mentions seperate smi registers for each port, using Port 1 smi register to access ethernet phys does not work. Hence only Port 0 smi register should be used to access all devices connected to the smi bus. This behavior is consistant with the mv643xx driver in the linux kerne