On 06.12.2011 20:56, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/06/2011 12:34 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 06.12.2011 19:27, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/06/2011 07:58 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Scott,
is there any problem with this pending change?
No, looks good.
Being a NAND Flash custodian, would yo
On 12/06/2011 12:34 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 06.12.2011 19:27, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 12/06/2011 07:58 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> is there any problem with this pending change?
>>
>> No, looks good.
>>
> Being a NAND Flash custodian, would you like to pick it up?
On 06.12.2011 19:27, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/06/2011 07:58 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 20.11.2011 16:10, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
This change follows the change by Wolfgang Grandegger (commit
6c869637fef),
which allows to remove useless NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions in board confi
On 12/06/2011 07:58 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 20.11.2011 16:10, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This change follows the change by Wolfgang Grandegger (commit
>> 6c869637fef),
>> which allows to remove useless NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions in board config
>> files.
>>
>> The change
Hi Scott,
On 20.11.2011 16:10, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
This change follows the change by Wolfgang Grandegger (commit 6c869637fef),
which allows to remove useless NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions in board config
files.
The change is based on u-boot.git/master, this branch contains 3 new boards
with
This change follows the change by Wolfgang Grandegger (commit 6c869637fef),
which allows to remove useless NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions in board config
files.
The change is based on u-boot.git/master, this branch contains 3 new boards
with the defined NAND_MAX_CHIPS macro, which are not present in
u
6 matches
Mail list logo