Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20100206080636.ga24...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> > i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems
> > which
> > typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
>
> Actually, I just copied the above line w
Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems which
> typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
Actually, I just copied the above line with "-name *" and stuff
because I know there are portability issues I'm not aware of.
Actually, Git blame
On Friday 05 February 2010 20:08:38 Ben Warren wrote:
> On 2/5/2010 4:01 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 05 February 2010 18:49:37 Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> >> Older versions created symbolic links for e.g. crc32.c.
> >> If such link remains in a tree, current Makefiles will use CC
> >> in
On 2/5/2010 4:01 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2010 18:49:37 Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>
>> Older versions created symbolic links for e.g. crc32.c.
>> If such link remains in a tree, current Makefiles will use CC
>> instead of HOSTCC to compile it; this results in a linker er
On Friday 05 February 2010 18:49:37 Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> Older versions created symbolic links for e.g. crc32.c.
> If such link remains in a tree, current Makefiles will use CC
> instead of HOSTCC to compile it; this results in a linker error.
> To be safe, let's remove any link from earlier
Older versions created symbolic links for e.g. crc32.c.
If such link remains in a tree, current Makefiles will use CC
instead of HOSTCC to compile it; this results in a linker error.
To be safe, let's remove any link from earlier checkouts.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
Makefile |1 +
6 matches
Mail list logo
