Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds

Dear Ron Madrid, In message <697520.19982...@web83507.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> you wrote: > > I understand your concern. I am not sure what other #define would work. > Are you suggesting the creation of a new #define such as #define > CONFIG_NS16550_BASIC_OPS or something like that which can be put in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds

--- On Thu, 1/29/09, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > From: Wolfgang Denk > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL > builds > To: "Ron Madrid" > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 2:24 AM > Dear Ron Madrid

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds

Dear Ron Madrid, In message <1233187331-20244-1-git-send-email-ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net> you wrote: > This patch will exclude all functions from drivers/serial/ns16550.c from > NAND_SPL builds with exception of NS16550_putc and NS16550_init. This will > save > space and remove unused code from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds

This patch will exclude all functions from drivers/serial/ns16550.c from NAND_SPL builds with exception of NS16550_putc and NS16550_init. This will save space and remove unused code from already tightly constrained bootstrap images for NAND_SPL builds. Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid --- drivers/seri