Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Roman Zeyde,
>
> In message <6d23e4ef0911030355j47a653a0iea7b6cae2f3cb...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> I have noticed that the same error as described here
>> (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
>> happens when compiling the latest versi
Dear Roman Zeyde,
In message <6d23e4ef0911030355j47a653a0iea7b6cae2f3cb...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> I have noticed that the same error as described here
> (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
> happens when compiling the latest version of U-boot (v2009-11-rc1)
>
Hi Wolfgang ,
I have noticed that the same error as described here
(http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
happens when compiling the latest version of U-boot (v2009-11-rc1)
using arm-cortex_a8-linux-gnueabi gcc version 4.4.0
(crosstool-ng-hg_defa...@1620_187e06178dcb).
C
Dear Tom,
In message <20090805181400.gg11...@audi.shelbyville.oz> Ron Lee wrote:
>
> GCC 4.4 complains about this now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ron Lee
> ---
> lib_arm/board.c | 18 +-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib_arm/board.c b/lib_arm/bo
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:07:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> On 03:44 Thu 06 Aug , Ron wrote:
> >
> > GCC 4.4 complains about this now.
> I'd remove the inline ot all
The compiler likely will already inline/eradicate the defaults there, since
the empty definition is vi
On 03:44 Thu 06 Aug , Ron wrote:
>
> GCC 4.4 complains about this now.
I'd remove the inline ot all
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
GCC 4.4 complains about this now.
Signed-off-by: Ron Lee
---
lib_arm/board.c | 18 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib_arm/board.c b/lib_arm/board.c
index a44d308..02a55eb 100644
--- a/lib_arm/board.c
+++ b/lib_arm/board.c
@@ -124,23 +124,23 @
7 matches
Mail list logo