Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Correct ffs/fls regression for PowerPC etc

2009-09-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <200909171456.33234...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Thanks. I tested it on my faulting ppc4xx platform (sequoia). And the problem > is gone now, so thanks. Thanks for testing. > But I've spotted a problem with other platforms in this patch. See below... ... > > -#defin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Correct ffs/fls regression for PowerPC etc

2009-09-17 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Simon, On Thursday 17 September 2009 14:39:40 Simon Kagstrom wrote: > Correct ffs/fls regression for PowerPC etc > > Commits > > 02f99901ed1c9d828e3ea117f94ce2264bf8389e > 52d61227b66d4099b39c8309ab37cb67ee09a405 > > introduced a regression where platform-specific ffs/fls implementations

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Correct ffs/fls regression for PowerPC etc

2009-09-17 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Correct ffs/fls regression for PowerPC etc Commits 02f99901ed1c9d828e3ea117f94ce2264bf8389e 52d61227b66d4099b39c8309ab37cb67ee09a405 introduced a regression where platform-specific ffs/fls implementations were defined away. This patch corrects that by using PLATFORM_xxx instead of the name i