Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add +size syntax to nand commands to pad lengths to page sizes.

Thanks for the review! I have some questions below that'll help me get rev 2 correct. Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:24:20PM -0400, Josh Karabin wrote: >> @@ -119,8 +121,12 @@ arg_off_size(int argc, char *argv[], nand_info_t *nand, >> ulong *off, size_t *size >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add +size syntax to nand commands to pad lengths to page sizes.

Josh Karabin wrote: >> Why not support plussed for read as well? > > "read" isn't strictly necessary, since the existing code permits lengths > that result in page-unaligned reads. Would be nice to keep the syntax consistent and not error if the user does provide a plus, though. > Other operati

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add +size syntax to nand commands to pad lengths to page sizes.

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:24:20PM -0400, Josh Karabin wrote: > @@ -119,8 +121,12 @@ arg_off_size(int argc, char *argv[], nand_info_t *nand, > ulong *off, size_t *size > } > *off = part->offset; > if (argc >= 2) { > -

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add +size syntax to nand commands to pad lengths to page sizes.

This change implements the suggestion from an earlier thread for how to handle padding of non-page sized writes to NAND flashes. See http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-February/047795.html for the original discussion. Note that validity of tail page's memory is the reponsibility of the ca