Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: reset.c: fix comments, add option

2010-09-03 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Detlev Zundel schrieb: > Hi Reinhard, > >> - The comment was wrong/misleading >> - One would assume that a u-boot "reset" command should also >> reset the external hardware outside the SoC. Since its unknown >> whether some boards rely on that NOT being so, asserting the >> external reset signal i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: reset.c: fix comments, add option

2010-08-10 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Reinhard, > - The comment was wrong/misleading > - One would assume that a u-boot "reset" command should also > reset the external hardware outside the SoC. Since its unknown > whether some boards rely on that NOT being so, asserting the > external reset signal is optional > > Signed-off-by: Re

[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: reset.c: fix comments, add option

2010-08-09 Thread Reinhard Meyer
- The comment was wrong/misleading - One would assume that a u-boot "reset" command should also reset the external hardware outside the SoC. Since its unknown whether some boards rely on that NOT being so, asserting the external reset signal is optional Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer --- arch/arm