On 07/14/2011 02:30 PM, David Jander wrote:
>> You have to protect the code related to TO2 with CONFIG_MX51. As I can
>> see, the macro is called for MX.53, too, and the test produces wrong
>> results.
>
> Wow, you are right! So this code was actually broken in more ways than I
> initially thought
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:14:52 +0200
Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 01:56 PM, David Jander wrote:
> > This check was broken. r3 does not contain the silicon revision anymore, so
> > we need to reload it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Jander
> > ---
>
> Hi David,
>
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/m
On 07/14/2011 01:56 PM, David Jander wrote:
> This check was broken. r3 does not contain the silicon revision anymore, so
> we need to reload it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Jander
> ---
Hi David,
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S |4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion
This check was broken. r3 does not contain the silicon revision anymore, so
we need to reload it.
Signed-off-by: David Jander
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S
b/arch/arm/
4 matches
Mail list logo
