> > Any feedback on my last email above, or is disabling boot page
> > translation just a no-go?
>
> It is at this point.
>
> > Or is there an more ideal alternative? I really don't want to
> > change up
> > the memory map on all our Freescale boards, documentation, dts files,
> > etc because
On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I understand what the patch does. It just removes the
> capability of
> soft-resetting a core back into the boot translation code. I
> understand your problem I'm just not keen on solving it by
> completely
Hi Kumar,
> > >> I understand what the patch does. It just removes the capability of
> > >> soft-resetting a core back into the boot translation code. I
> > >> understand your problem I'm just not keen on solving it by completely
> > >> disabling boot translation.
> > >>
> > >> We had a similar
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 10:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 17:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009
On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 17:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Previously, boot page
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 17:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> >>
> >>> Previously, boot page translation was enabled while U-Boot executed.
> >>>
On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>>
>>> Previously, boot page translation was enabled while U-Boot executed.
>>> This resulted in the address range 0xf000 - 0x being
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
> > Previously, boot page translation was enabled while U-Boot executed.
> > This resulted in the address range 0xf000 - 0x being
> > translated to SDRAM which made the 0xfxxx ad
On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Previously, boot page translation was enabled while U-Boot executed.
> This resulted in the address range 0xf000 - 0x being
> translated to SDRAM which made the 0xfxxx address space unusable
> for
> other peripherals.
>
> This cha
Previously, boot page translation was enabled while U-Boot executed.
This resulted in the address range 0xf000 - 0x being
translated to SDRAM which made the 0xfxxx address space unusable for
other peripherals.
This change disables boot page translation after the secondary CPU cores
10 matches
Mail list logo
