Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-15 Thread Sagar Heroorkar
i am working on Powerpc. sorry for the late response. -SAgar On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 15/07/2010 00:35, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > > Le 14/07/2010 23:49, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > >> > >> why not keeping the list on Cc:? > > > > Wrong

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 15/07/2010 00:35, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > Le 14/07/2010 23:49, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, >> >> why not keeping the list on Cc:? > > Wrong and unintended action on my part, sorry: I hit the wrong reply > button (maybe there's a Thunderbird plugin that helps avoiding this?

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/07/2010 23:49, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > why not keeping the list on Cc:? Wrong and unintended action on my part, sorry: I hit the wrong reply button (maybe there's a Thunderbird plugin that helps avoiding this?). As I don't know if you meant this reply of yours to

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4c3e20a3.1020...@free.fr> you wrote: > > > Eventually your processor (which you do not care to mention) has it's > > reset entry point at the end of the physical addess space, so this > > will always be included in theimage - the further you move TEXT_BASE > > down

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4c3e135b.7040...@free.fr> you wrote: > > Even if your "golden", uboot1 and uboot2 bootloaders are all full-blown > u-boots, you still don't need to change their TEXT_BASE: just make sur > uboot{1,2} have CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT defined, and that "golden" Be care

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/07/2010 22:29, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Eventually your processor (which you do not care to mention) has it's > reset entry point at the end of the physical addess space, so this > will always be included in theimage - the further you move TEXT_BASE > down, the bigger your image will be. U

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sagar Heroorkar, In message you wrote: > > I changed the TEXT_BASE to implement the uboot redundancy. I got in to > problem of having image size. > > See this: > > > I am planning to implement uboot redundancy. > This means having the following idea which we thought. > > Golden-Uboot wh

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sagar Heroorkar, please mind the Netiquette - do not top post, do not full quote. In message you wrote: > > I am trying to relocate the uboot code to different address in the norflash. You definitely do NOT want to do that - mind that "relocate" is a well-defined term that does not mean

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/07/2010 21:25, Sagar Heroorkar a écrit : > I changed the TEXT_BASE to implement the uboot redundancy. I got in to > problem of having image size. > See this: > I am planning to implement uboot redundancy. > This means having the following idea which we thought. > > Golden-Uboot which is flash

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Sagar Heroorkar
I changed the TEXT_BASE to implement the uboot redundancy. I got in to problem of having image size. See this: I am planning to implement uboot redundancy. This means having the following idea which we thought. Golden-Uboot which is flashed in the NOR-FLASH. This is not field upgradable. This g

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-14 Thread Sagar Heroorkar
I am trying to relocate the uboot code to different address in the norflash. -Sagar On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Sagar Heroorkar, > > In message > you wrote: > > > > I changed the TEXT_BASE address to something different. I see that the > image > > size of the u

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-13 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sagar Heroorkar, In message you wrote: > > I changed the TEXT_BASE address to something different. I see that the image > size of the uboot is changed so much. It seems you did not really understand what your change is doing, so maybe you explain why you made this change in the first plac

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-13 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 13/07/2010 20:38, Sagar Heroorkar a écrit : > Hi All, > > I changed the TEXT_BASE address to something different. I see that the image > size of the uboot is changed so much. > > Image size became to 28MB. I dotn know how to make it to 384k. > > Earliar text base was at address fffa > now i

[U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

2010-07-13 Thread Sagar Heroorkar
Hi All, I changed the TEXT_BASE address to something different. I see that the image size of the uboot is changed so much. Image size became to 28MB. I dotn know how to make it to 384k. Earliar text base was at address fffa now i changed to fe40 let me know what else i should change so