On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:57 PM Bernhard Messerklinger
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> >>> With this patch I moved the fsp-m configuration to the device-tree
> >>> based on the baytrail boards.
> >>> I have tried to build it so that only entries that differ from the
> >>> default configuration need to be
Hi Simon,
>>> With this patch I moved the fsp-m configuration to the device-tree
>>> based on the baytrail boards.
>>> I have tried to build it so that only entries that differ from the
>>> default configuration need to be added. As a minimum the ddr
>>> configuration must be present.
>>> If you l
Hi Simon,
>> With this patch I moved the fsp-m configuration to the device-tree
>> based on the baytrail boards.
>> I have tried to build it so that only entries that differ from the
>> default configuration need to be added. As a minimum the ddr
>> configuration must be present.
>> If you like th
Hi Bernhard,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 06:30, Bernhard Messerklinger
wrote:
>
> Move FSP-M configuration to the device-tree like it's already done for
> other SoCs (Baytaril).
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Messerklinger
>
> ---
> With this patch I moved the fsp-m configuration to the device-tree bas
Move FSP-M configuration to the device-tree like it's already done for
other SoCs (Baytaril).
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Messerklinger
---
With this patch I moved the fsp-m configuration to the device-tree based
on the baytrail boards.
I have tried to build it so that only entries that differ from t
5 matches
Mail list logo