Hi Tom,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 08:49, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 07:15:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 13:41, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
> > > Makefiles as part of the
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 07:15:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 13:41, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
> > Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
> > Makefiles based on
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 13:41, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
> Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
> Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
> bring this down to a
It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
bring this down to a single macro and use "$(PHASE_)" only.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
4 matches
Mail list logo
