Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] clk: Switch from soc_clk_dump to clk_ops function

2023-12-15 Thread Sean Anderson
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:55:08 +0300, Igor Prusov wrote: > Currently clock providers may override default implementation of > soc_clk_dump function to replace clk dump command output. This causes > confusing behaviour when u-boot is built with one of such drivers > enabled but still has clocks defined

Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] clk: Switch from soc_clk_dump to clk_ops function

2023-12-12 Thread Sean Anderson
On 12/12/23 09:03, Neil Armstrong wrote: Hi Igor, Sean, On 09/11/2023 11:55, Igor Prusov wrote: Currently clock providers may override default implementation of soc_clk_dump function to replace clk dump command output. This causes confusing behaviour when u-boot is built with one of such driver

Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] clk: Switch from soc_clk_dump to clk_ops function

2023-12-12 Thread Neil Armstrong
Hi Igor, Sean, On 09/11/2023 11:55, Igor Prusov wrote: Currently clock providers may override default implementation of soc_clk_dump function to replace clk dump command output. This causes confusing behaviour when u-boot is built with one of such drivers enabled but still has clocks defined usi

[PATCH v7 0/8] clk: Switch from soc_clk_dump to clk_ops function

2023-11-09 Thread Igor Prusov
Currently clock providers may override default implementation of soc_clk_dump function to replace clk dump command output. This causes confusing behaviour when u-boot is built with one of such drivers enabled but still has clocks defined using CCF. For example, enabling CMD_CLK and using clk dump o