On 12/1/20 9:48 PM, dario...@libero.it wrote:
Dear Heinrich
On 11/22/20 5:11 PM, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> The __of_translate_address routine translates an address from the
> device tree into a CPU physical address. A note in the description of
> the routine explains that the crossing of any lev
Dear Heinrich
>
> On 11/22/20 5:11 PM, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > The __of_translate_address routine translates an address from the
> > device tree into a CPU physical address. A note in the description of
> > the routine explains that the crossing of any level with
> > #size-c
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 09:11, Dario Binacchi wrote:
>
> The __of_translate_address routine translates an address from the
> device tree into a CPU physical address. A note in the description of
> the routine explains that the crossing of any level with
> #size-cells = <0> is to be considered an er
On 11/22/20 5:11 PM, Dario Binacchi wrote:
The __of_translate_address routine translates an address from the
device tree into a CPU physical address. A note in the description of
the routine explains that the crossing of any level with
#size-cells = <0> is to be considered an error not by specifi
The __of_translate_address routine translates an address from the
device tree into a CPU physical address. A note in the description of
the routine explains that the crossing of any level with
#size-cells = <0> is to be considered an error not by specification but
since inherited from IBM. This doe
5 matches
Mail list logo
