Hi Tom,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 07:00, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 06:53:55AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 08:28:05AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > The reserve_stack_aligned(
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 06:53:55AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 08:28:05AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > The reserve_stack_aligned() function already ensures that the resulting
> > > address is aligned t
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 08:28:05AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > The reserve_stack_aligned() function already ensures that the resulting
> > address is aligned to a 16-byte boundary. The comment seems to suggest
> > that 16 is passed rese
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 08:28:05AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> The reserve_stack_aligned() function already ensures that the resulting
> address is aligned to a 16-byte boundary. The comment seems to suggest
> that 16 is passed reserve_stack_aligned() to make it aligned.
>
> Change the value to 0
The reserve_stack_aligned() function already ensures that the resulting
address is aligned to a 16-byte boundary. The comment seems to suggest
that 16 is passed reserve_stack_aligned() to make it aligned.
Change the value to 0, since the stack can start at the current address,
if it is suitably al
5 matches
Mail list logo
