Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 07:27:19AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 07:22, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:53:31PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 10:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 20

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-15 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 07:22, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:53:31PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 10:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:09:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > In principle bootstd can

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:53:31PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 10:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:09:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > In principle bootstd can work without block devices, even if it does > > > require driver model t

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-13 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 10:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:09:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > In principle bootstd can work without block devices, even if it does > > require driver model to be enabled in that case. > > > > The use of a 'depends on BLK' for BOOTSTD

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:09:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > In principle bootstd can work without block devices, even if it does > require driver model to be enabled in that case. > > The use of a 'depends on BLK' for BOOTSTD conflicts with the way 'BLK' > is now defined, producing recursive e

[PATCH v5 1/8] bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK

2024-11-13 Thread Simon Glass
In principle bootstd can work without block devices, even if it does require driver model to be enabled in that case. The use of a 'depends on BLK' for BOOTSTD conflicts with the way 'BLK' is now defined, producing recursive errors through multiple different paths, one of which is this (with Links