Hi Heinrich,
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 05:07, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 3/6/25 01:25, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Rather than holding the state in the implementation code, move it to the
> > command code. The state is now passed to the implementation functions
> > and can there (with future work)
On 3/6/25 01:25, Simon Glass wrote:
Rather than holding the state in the implementation code, move it to the
command code. The state is now passed to the implementation functions
and can there (with future work) be pass in from bootstd, without going
Nits
%s/pass/passsed/
through the commands
Rather than holding the state in the implementation code, move it to the
command code. The state is now passed to the implementation functions
and can there (with future work) be pass in from bootstd, without going
through the commands.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
(no changes since v1)
arch
3 matches
Mail list logo
