Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:42:19 +0200 > From: Heinrich Schuchardt > > On 4/28/22 11:09, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> We call efi_disk_init() after the MMC device is probed. Therefore > >> probing of the MCC device does not trigger EVT_DM_POST_PROBE. > >> > >> We have to move the efi_disk_init() ca

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-28 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/28/22 11:09, Mark Kettenis wrote: We call efi_disk_init() after the MMC device is probed. Therefore probing of the MCC device does not trigger EVT_DM_POST_PROBE. We have to move the efi_disk_init() call before initr_dm(). [PATCH 1/1] efi_loader: call efi_init_early() earlier https://lists.

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:45:51 +0200 > Content-Language: en-US > From: Heinrich Schuchardt > Cc: masami.hirama...@linaro.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de, s...@chromium.org, > ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org, Tom Rini , > Mark Kettenis > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 4/

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-27 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/28/22 06:52, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:26:09PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: Heinrich, On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-27 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:26:09PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Heinrich, > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > >> On 4/26/22 01:44, AKA

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Heinrich, On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >> I expect that boards that booted with previous versi

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:18:13PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:02:46 +0200 > > From: Heinrich Schuchardt > > > > On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > >> On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahi

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:02:46 +0200 > From: Heinrich Schuchardt > > On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >> I expect that boards that booted with previous versions of U

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/26/22 16:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >> I expect that boards that booted with previous versions of U-Boot using >> the respective defconfig still boot. But they don't. Here is one

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:43:44PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 4/19/22 03:05, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-26 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/26/22 01:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:43:44PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 4/19/22 03:05, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a list of its disk objects dynamically at runtime based on block device's probing. (See

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-25 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:43:44PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 4/19/22 03:05, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a list of its > > disk objects dynamically at runtime based on block device's probing. > > (See "issues" and "prerequisite" be

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-25 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/19/22 03:05, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a list of its disk objects dynamically at runtime based on block device's probing. (See "issues" and "prerequisite" below.) [1] https://github.com/t-akashi/u-boot/tree/efi/dm_disk For instance, =>

[PATCH v5 00/12] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model

2022-04-18 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a list of its disk objects dynamically at runtime based on block device's probing. (See "issues" and "prerequisite" below.) [1] https://github.com/t-akashi/u-boot/tree/efi/dm_disk For instance, => dm tree Class Index Probed Driver