Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] ClearFog Base static variant support

Hi Stefan, On Mon, Mar 23 2020, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 22.03.20 19:46, Joel Johnson wrote: >> I just wanted to ping on this review >> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=155533) to see if it >> had reached an agreeable state or if there were still lingering issues. I've >> be

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] ClearFog Base static variant support

Hi Joel, On 22.03.20 19:46, Joel Johnson wrote: I just wanted to ping on this review (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=155533) to see if it had reached an agreeable state or if there were still lingering issues. I've been using it without issue against RC releases. If t

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] ClearFog Base static variant support

I just wanted to ping on this review (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=155533) to see if it had reached an agreeable state or if there were still lingering issues. I've been using it without issue against RC releases. If the plan is to not include it in v2020.04 that's co

[PATCH v5 00/12] ClearFog Base static variant support

This patch series adds support for ClearFog Base static configuration, as well as updating and fixing the ClearFog support for MMC and SPI booting. v2 changes: - updated against, and dependent on, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324 v3 changes: - rebased against ClearFog runtime TLV