On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:25:04AM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
> patch replaces the checks for CMD_BOOT[IZ] with newly added configs
> SPL_HAS_BOOT[IZ].
>
> SPL_HAS_BOOTZ is enabled by default for 32-bit ARM systems and
> SP
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 04:00:01PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> On Tue Apr 1, 2025 at 4:33 AM IST, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:25:04AM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> >
> >> Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
> >> patch replaces the checks for CM
On Fri Mar 14, 2025 at 9:25 AM IST, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
> patch replaces the checks for CMD_BOOT[IZ] with newly added configs
> SPL_HAS_BOOT[IZ].
>
> SPL_HAS_BOOTZ is enabled by default for 32-bit ARM systems and
> SPL_HAS_BO
On Tue Apr 1, 2025 at 4:33 AM IST, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:25:04AM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
>
>> Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
>> patch replaces the checks for CMD_BOOT[IZ] with newly added configs
>> SPL_HAS_BOOT[IZ].
>>
>> SPL_HAS_
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:25:04AM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
> patch replaces the checks for CMD_BOOT[IZ] with newly added configs
> SPL_HAS_BOOT[IZ].
>
> SPL_HAS_BOOTZ is enabled by default for 32-bit ARM systems and
> SP
Using CMD_* configs from spl doesn't make logical sense. Therefore this
patch replaces the checks for CMD_BOOT[IZ] with newly added configs
SPL_HAS_BOOT[IZ].
SPL_HAS_BOOTZ is enabled by default for 32-bit ARM systems and
SPL_HAS_BOOTI is enabled by default for 64-bit ARM and RISCV. This
ensures co
6 matches
Mail list logo