Re: [PATCH v4] patman: By default don't pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch for linux

2022-07-26 Thread Simon Glass
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 16:00, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > When you pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch it disables some extra checks > that are important for Linux. Specifically I want checks like: > > warning: DT compatible string "boogie,woogie" appears un-documented > check ./Documentation/devic

Re: [PATCH v4] patman: By default don't pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch for linux

2022-07-20 Thread Simon Glass
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 16:00, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > When you pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch it disables some extra checks > that are important for Linux. Specifically I want checks like: > > warning: DT compatible string "boogie,woogie" appears un-documented > check ./Documentation/devic

[PATCH v4] patman: By default don't pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch for linux

2022-07-19 Thread Douglas Anderson
When you pass "--no-tree" to checkpatch it disables some extra checks that are important for Linux. Specifically I want checks like: warning: DT compatible string "boogie,woogie" appears un-documented check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ Let's make the default for Linux to _not_ pass --