Hi Sebastian,
On 2024-08-03 18:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 11:04:05PM GMT, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> On 2024-08-02 19:59, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>> Since older U-Boot releases do not negotiate USB PD, the kernel
>>> DT may not enable t
On 2024/8/3 01:59, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Since older U-Boot releases do not negotiate USB PD, the kernel
DT may not enable the USB-C controller by default to avoid a
regression. The plan is to upstream it with 'status = "fail";'
instead. U-Boot should then mark it as 'status = "okay";' if
it
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 11:04:05PM GMT, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 2024-08-02 19:59, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Since older U-Boot releases do not negotiate USB PD, the kernel
> > DT may not enable the USB-C controller by default to avoid a
> > regression. The plan is
Hi Sebastian,
On 2024-08-02 19:59, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Since older U-Boot releases do not negotiate USB PD, the kernel
> DT may not enable the USB-C controller by default to avoid a
> regression. The plan is to upstream it with 'status = "fail";'
> instead. U-Boot should then mark it as 'st
Since older U-Boot releases do not negotiate USB PD, the kernel
DT may not enable the USB-C controller by default to avoid a
regression. The plan is to upstream it with 'status = "fail";'
instead. U-Boot should then mark it as 'status = "okay";' if
it negotiated USB PD. Currently existing upstream
5 matches
Mail list logo