On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:11:28PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024, 19:06 Vincent Stehlé, wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 01:00:51PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > (..)
> > > The current specification is in RFC 9562, 4.1, "Variant field"
> > >
> > > "The variant fie
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024, 19:06 Vincent Stehlé, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 01:00:51PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> (..)
> > The current specification is in RFC 9562, 4.1, "Variant field"
> >
> > "The variant field consists of a variable number of the most significant
> > bits of octet 8 o
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 01:00:51PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
(..)
> The current specification is in RFC 9562, 4.1, "Variant field"
>
> "The variant field consists of a variable number of the most significant
> bits of octet 8 of the UUID.
>
> ...
>
> Specifically for UUIDs in this docume
On 21.06.24 13:25, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 14:01, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
[...]
$ uuid -d 935FE837-FAC8-4394-C008-737D8852C60D
encode: STR: 935fe837-fac8-4394-c008-737d8852c60d
SIV: 195894493536133784175416063449172723213
decode
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 14:01, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> [...]
>
> > > > $ uuid -d 935FE837-FAC8-4394-C008-737D8852C60D
> > > > encode: STR: 935fe837-fac8-4394-c008-737d8852c60d
> > > > SIV: 195894493536133784175416063449172723213
> > > > decode: variant: r
Hi Vincent,
[...]
> > > $ uuid -d 935FE837-FAC8-4394-C008-737D8852C60D
> > > encode: STR: 935fe837-fac8-4394-c008-737d8852c60d
> > > SIV: 195894493536133784175416063449172723213
> > > decode: variant: reserved (Microsoft GUID)
> > > version: 4 (random data based)
On 21.06.24 11:12, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:15:32PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Allô Vincent,
Hi Ilias :)
Thanks for testing!
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:02, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:50:34PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
As more boards ad
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:15:32PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Allô Vincent,
Hi Ilias :)
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:02, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:50:34PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> > > As more boards adopt support for the EFI C
Allô Vincent,
Thanks for testing!
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:02, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:50:34PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> > As more boards adopt support for the EFI CapsuleUpdate mechanism, there
> > is a growing issue of being able to target updates to them pro
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:50:34PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> As more boards adopt support for the EFI CapsuleUpdate mechanism, there
> is a growing issue of being able to target updates to them properly. The
> current mechanism of hardcoding UUIDs for each board at compile time is
> unsustaina
On 05/06/2024 07:59, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 5/31/24 15:50, Caleb Connolly wrote:
As more boards adopt support for the EFI CapsuleUpdate mechanism, there
is a growing issue of being able to target updates to them properly. The
current mechanism of hardcoding UUIDs for each board at comp
On 5/31/24 15:50, Caleb Connolly wrote:
As more boards adopt support for the EFI CapsuleUpdate mechanism, there
is a growing issue of being able to target updates to them properly. The
current mechanism of hardcoding UUIDs for each board at compile time is
unsustainable, and maintaining lists of
As more boards adopt support for the EFI CapsuleUpdate mechanism, there
is a growing issue of being able to target updates to them properly. The
current mechanism of hardcoding UUIDs for each board at compile time is
unsustainable, and maintaining lists of GUIDs is similarly cumbersome.
In this se
13 matches
Mail list logo
