On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 08:49:17PM +0200, Tomas Paukrt wrote:
> The mmc erase command currently requires blk# and cnt parameters
> which can be obtained using the part start and part size commands
> if the entire partition needs to be erased.
>
> Simplify the use of the mmc erase command by allow
Hi Tomas,
On 9/3/24 12:14 PM, Tomas Paukrt wrote:
Same question as for v1, are we sure that the partition block size is
the same as the MMC erase block size? Is this guaranteed by all
standards (all MMC standards, and all partition table standards)?
Otherwise I assume we should do some maths her
> Same question as for v1, are we sure that the partition block size is
> the same as the MMC erase block size? Is this guaranteed by all
> standards (all MMC standards, and all partition table standards)?
> Otherwise I assume we should do some maths here to figure out the MMC
> start block AND blo
Hi Tomas,
On 9/2/24 8:49 PM, Tomas Paukrt wrote:
The mmc erase command currently requires blk# and cnt parameters
which can be obtained using the part start and part size commands
if the entire partition needs to be erased.
Simplify the use of the mmc erase command by allowing the partition
nam
The mmc erase command currently requires blk# and cnt parameters
which can be obtained using the part start and part size commands
if the entire partition needs to be erased.
Simplify the use of the mmc erase command by allowing the partition
name to be specified directly.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Pa
5 matches
Mail list logo
