On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 1:23 AM Mattijs Korpershoek
wrote:
>
> On dim., juil. 30, 2023 at 11:15, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > This name is a little confusing since it suggests that it sets up the
> > sibling block device. In fact it sets up a bootdev for it. Rename the
> > function to make this cleare
On dim., juil. 30, 2023 at 11:15, Simon Glass wrote:
> This name is a little confusing since it suggests that it sets up the
> sibling block device. In fact it sets up a bootdev for it. Rename the
> function to make this clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:15 AM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> This name is a little confusing since it suggests that it sets up the
> sibling block device. In fact it sets up a bootdev for it. Rename the
> function to make this clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix the
This name is a little confusing since it suggests that it sets up the
sibling block device. In fact it sets up a bootdev for it. Rename the
function to make this clearer.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix the function name in the header as well
boot/bootdev-uclass.c
4 matches
Mail list logo
