Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mkimge: Reject signing-related flags without FIT_SIGNATURE

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 02:42:16PM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote: > When CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE=n the signing options are not available. If a > user is careful they will notice this when looking at the help output. > > If they are not careful they will waste several hours wondering why > their FIT does

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mkimge: Reject signing-related flags without FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 08:38, Philippe REYNES wrote: > > Hi Joel > > > Le 08/12/2020 à 05:12, Joel Stanley a écrit : > > When CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE=n the signing options are not available. If a > > user is careful they will notice this when looking at the help output. > > > > If they are not ca

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mkimge: Reject signing-related flags without FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Joel Le 08/12/2020 à 05:12, Joel Stanley a écrit : When CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE=n the signing options are not available. If a user is careful they will notice this when looking at the help output. If they are not careful they will waste several hours wondering why their FIT doesn't contain a /

[PATCH v2 4/4] mkimge: Reject signing-related flags without FIT_SIGNATURE

When CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE=n the signing options are not available. If a user is careful they will notice this when looking at the help output. If they are not careful they will waste several hours wondering why their FIT doesn't contain a /signature node, as mkimage will silently ingore the signin