Hi,
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 01:43, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> > According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
> > struct bootmeth:
> >
> > """
> > For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
> >
> > - bootdev is used in
Hi Heinrich,
On 6/17/24 11:24 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 17.06.24 11:00, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi all,
On 6/17/24 8:31 AM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Thank you for your review.
On dim., juin 16, 2024 at 09:38, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korper
On 17.06.24 11:00, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi all,
On 6/17/24 8:31 AM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Thank you for your review.
On dim., juin 16, 2024 at 09:38, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
According to [1], we should use bootmeth when des
Hi all,
On 6/17/24 8:31 AM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Thank you for your review.
On dim., juin 16, 2024 at 09:38, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
struct bootmeth:
"""
For vers
Hi Heinrich,
Thank you for your review.
On dim., juin 16, 2024 at 09:38, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
>> According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
>> struct bootmeth:
>>
>> """
>> For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
On 6/4/24 17:15, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
struct bootmeth:
"""
For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
- bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused,
is everywhere in U-Boot, can be
Hi Quentin,
Thank you for the review.
On mar., juin 04, 2024 at 17:25, Quentin Schulz
wrote:
> Hi Mattijs,
>
> On 6/4/24 5:15 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
>> According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
>> struct bootmeth:
>>
>> """
>> For version 2, a new naming scheme is u
Hi Mattijs,
On 6/4/24 5:15 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
struct bootmeth:
"""
For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
- bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused,
is everywhere in
According to [1], we should use bootmeth when describing the
struct bootmeth:
"""
For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
- bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused,
is everywhere in U-Boot, can be confused with udevice
- bootmeth - because
9 matches
Mail list logo
