On 2/25/25 10:52, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>
>
> On 2/24/25 19:39, Dario Binacchi wrote:
>> It is pointless to use the custom compatible "st,button1" when
>> stm32746g-eval.dts and stm32f769-disco.dts already contain the
>> "gpio-keys" compatible, which is specifically used for button
>> managem
On 3/10/25 11:03, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/25 10:52, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/24/25 19:39, Dario Binacchi wrote:
>>> It is pointless to use the custom compatible "st,button1" when
>>> stm32746g-eval.dts and stm32f769-disco.dts already contain the
>>> "gpio-keys" compati
On 2/24/25 19:39, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> It is pointless to use the custom compatible "st,button1" when
> stm32746g-eval.dts and stm32f769-disco.dts already contain the
> "gpio-keys" compatible, which is specifically used for button
> management.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi
>
> ---
>
It is pointless to use the custom compatible "st,button1" when
stm32746g-eval.dts and stm32f769-disco.dts already contain the
"gpio-keys" compatible, which is specifically used for button
management.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi
---
Changes in v2:
- Drop gpio-keys node from stm32f746-disco-u-b
4 matches
Mail list logo