Re: [PATCH v2 068/169] Correct SPL use of DM_RNG

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 06:08:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 17:40, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > > > no SPL_DM_RNG defin

Re: [PATCH v2 068/169] Correct SPL use of DM_RNG

Hi Tom, On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 17:40, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > > no SPL_DM_RNG defined in Kconfig > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > --- > > > > (no changes

Re: [PATCH v2 068/169] Correct SPL use of DM_RNG

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > no SPL_DM_RNG defined in Kconfig > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > boot/vbe_request.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertio

[PATCH v2 068/169] Correct SPL use of DM_RNG

This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is no SPL_DM_RNG defined in Kconfig Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- (no changes since v1) boot/vbe_request.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/boot/vbe_request.c b/boot/vbe_request.c index 45