Hi Tom,
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 10:10, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:35:36AM -0400, Raymond Mao wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 20:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:05:21PM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
> > >
> > > > Motivations for changes:
>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:19:41AM -0400, Raymond Mao wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 10:10, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:35:36AM -0400, Raymond Mao wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 20:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:35:36AM -0400, Raymond Mao wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 20:23, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:05:21PM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
> >
> > > Motivations for changes:
> > > Current SMBIOS library and command-line tool is not fully matching
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 20:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:05:21PM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
>
> > Motivations for changes:
> > Current SMBIOS library and command-line tool is not fully matching with
> > the requirements:
> > 1. Missing support for other mandatory types (
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:05:21PM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
> Motivations for changes:
> Current SMBIOS library and command-line tool is not fully matching with
> the requirements:
> 1. Missing support for other mandatory types (#7, #9, #16, #17, #19).
> 2. Only a few platforms support SMBIOS nod
Motivations for changes:
Current SMBIOS library and command-line tool is not fully matching with
the requirements:
1. Missing support for other mandatory types (#7, #9, #16, #17, #19).
2. Only a few platforms support SMBIOS node from the device tree.
3. Values of some fields are hardcoded in the li
6 matches
Mail list logo