Re: [PATCH v2] net: wget: Support non-default HTTP port

2023-12-18 Thread Ramon Fried
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 1:06 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:11:13PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Currently the wget command is hard wired to HTTP port 80. This is > > inconvenient, as it is extremely easy to start trivial HTTP server > > as an unprivileged user using e.g. pyt

Re: [PATCH v2] net: wget: Support non-default HTTP port

2023-12-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:11:13PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Currently the wget command is hard wired to HTTP port 80. This is > inconvenient, as it is extremely easy to start trivial HTTP server > as an unprivileged user using e.g. python http module to serve the > files, but such a server has

[PATCH v2] net: wget: Support non-default HTTP port

2023-12-13 Thread Marek Vasut
Currently the wget command is hard wired to HTTP port 80. This is inconvenient, as it is extremely easy to start trivial HTTP server as an unprivileged user using e.g. python http module to serve the files, but such a server has to run on one of the higher ports: " $ python3 -m http.server -d $(pwd